Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
...against them.

This is a small exercise that expresses the kind of "logic" people with sexual obsession with wolves use to justify why their mutts supposedly are the superior race. Most of the time they stick to quoting disproved sources and whining how Wikipedia is "evil", but sometimes they happen to have slightly more elaborate excuses, which invariably use the following type of illogical reasoning.

As such, when a retarded wolfaboo expresses their hilariously stupid statements, I advise you to use some of these exercises, so that the wolfaboo can look like an hypocrital retard by not realising that their own brand of logic is being used way more intelligently than they could ever hope.

Example: Why the wolf is evil (response to justifications of canine moral superiority)

1- Wolves live in forests

2- Forests are dark because sunlight cannot reach the ground

3- The Sun is universally recognised as symbolic of enlightment and reason

4- If forests are a shield against sunlight, they are evil places

5- Grasslands, by contrast, are open to the light of the Sun, to the point of aridity

6- Hyenas live in grasslands

7- Wolves live in forests

8- Therefore, hyenas are morally superior to wolves

9- However, darkness doesn't always equal evil

10- However, wolves are nocturnal

11- The night is associated with the Moon

12- The Moon is light and dark

13- Wolves have no notions of morality because the Moon doesn't stick to either light or dark

14- Wolves are, therefore, completly and utterly amoral, while hyenas are aligned exclusively to light and therefore have a well defined moral code

15- By extension, moles are also morally superior to wolves, as they too have a well defined moral code, being constantly in darkness and not being affected by the Moon's lack of permanent stance in regards to light and darkness
...
Add a Comment:
 
:iconthemorlock:
TheMorlock Featured By Owner Feb 21, 2012  Student General Artist
I love the bit about moles. :D
Reply
:iconfinding-equilibrium:
finding-equilibrium Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Who says wolves live only in forests?
What about the tundra, the arctic?
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2011  Student Writer
Nigh perpetual darkness except for the Summer. Actually better an example of the "wolfaboo style logic".
Reply
:iconfinding-equilibrium:
finding-equilibrium Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Good point.
But when you get right down to it, these are all just metaphors, not scientific facts. I wouldn't call a wolf evil because it is in the sunlight less than other species.


And that's just 88 out of 364.4 days of darkness, anyway.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2011  Student Writer
Nobody sane would call something "evil" just ecause it lives in the dark. This is precisey the type of thought I'm trying to erode here, which is actually more logical than some things I've seen wolfaboos saying.
Reply
:iconfinding-equilibrium:
finding-equilibrium Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
agreed.
Reply
:iconanimailiankin:
AnimailianKin Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
...did that make sence?
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2011  Student Writer
Not in the least bit, and the atrocious grammar doesn't help.
Reply
:iconanimailiankin:
AnimailianKin Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
yes, spelling sucks...but there is alot of one animal favoriters( comonly wolven) who are banned.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2011  Student Writer
Do consider than people are banned for rather nonsensical reasons nowadays, so there's no reason to be paranoid.

People who pester other's comment galleries and whine incoherently, however, are usually the first to go, and many wolfaboos do that, which could offer a pattern, but I honestly don't know or care.
Reply
:iconanimailiankin:
AnimailianKin Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
they do, do it alot. say one thing, they get it wrong and over react
Reply
:iconanimailiankin:
AnimailianKin Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
heres something ive been seeing lately: most people who are over absesive over one animal: banned. or:
people say that one is absesive over one animal and are wolafaboos, catfan(whatever that was i dont remeber) when they are not. just dont enjoy killing as much as others do, and dont use others saying as a idea of animals actions, or not just think of an animal being best because they want but because theyv seen there actions real life and know what they trully act like.
and no,this is not refering to my own, ive seen this with plenty others
Reply
:iconsapphicstardust:
sapphicstardust Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2011  Student Traditional Artist
and actually, the haters are more annoying than the wolfaboos.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2011  Student Writer
Because pointing out why other animal species are deserving of consideration is much worse than whining about wolves being endangered when they are not [/sarcasm]
Reply
:iconsapphicstardust:
sapphicstardust Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2011  Student Traditional Artist
umm how in god's name did you work out that the moon affects an animal's morality?
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2011  Student Writer
Same way wolfaboos come up with "arguments" as to why wolves supposedly are the superior species.
Reply
:icontarbano:
tarbano Featured By Owner Aug 28, 2011
my god... you actually did it!
:iconclapplz:
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 28, 2011  Student Writer
:bow:
Reply
:iconeatthepie53:
eatthepie53 Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2011  Student Photographer
You made a logical bridge between the divine forces of nature and the superiority of moles to wolves. That is by far the farthest reach I've seen human intellegence go in the past week. Which would completely make sense, seeing as the shortest reaches were the statements of wolfaboos. You are therefore considered one of the divine forces of intellegence on dA.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 11, 2011  Student Writer
Yay, I'm credible again :D
Reply
:iconartifex96:
artifex96 Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2011  Student General Artist
this would be very useful
Reply
:iconcharanty:
Charanty Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2011
This is amazing. I'm totally using this. :iconimcryingsomuchplz:
Reply
:iconziblink:
Ziblink Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
Wolves gang up on poor, innocent and especially weak prey animals. Henas try to take down lions. A lone wolf becomes desperate and often dies. A lone hyena can do just fine. Wolves pup in the normal way, hyenas have to give birth through a pseudopenis which is as dangerous as it sounds. Ergo hyenas are stronger than wolves

A lone wolf has to fight to enter a pack, often kicking out the alpha male to do so. A lone hyena can join whatever pack they want. Wolves howl, hyenas laugh. Pet wolves are unpredictable. Pet hyenas are slightly more predictable. Wolves are male dominated, regulating sex among the pack. Gay wolves don't live long. Hyena are more equal, with females and males being difficult to tell apart, thus gay hyenas are accepted. Ergo, hyenas are morally superior to wolves.

Wolves sniff and lick each other's butts. They roll in dead things, get muddy and infested with fleas, ticks ad worms. Due to climate this seldom happens to hyenas. Ergo, hyenas are cleaner than wolves.

I can go on, in comparison with nearly any other species. By logic that makes wolves the worst species ever.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Student Writer
Wolves are homophobic? That alone makes them the worse animals alive, since most species don't bother with killing their gay members
Reply
:iconziblink:
Ziblink Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
It's a side-effect of the fact that a male wolf attempting to engage in breeding behavior will be attacked and killed. (Females are merely raped or attacked.) Some other species have this result (If you're a male mantis and you approach another male... yeah.) usually against male members. In this it's more a result of 'wrong behavior, wrong time' A lot of other species just have the 'whut r doin? Get off me!' response.

On a side note, scientists were able to get gay rats of both genders to 'mate' by dabbing the right pheromones. Isn't animal behavior great?
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Student Writer
It seems consuming methylmercury makes all kinds of wading birds gay. Animal psyches seem ridiculously easy to manipulate.
Reply
:iconziblink:
Ziblink Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
Well if you believe the 'born this way' credo there should be a simplish switch somewhere to flip the brain over, aside from which a lot of sexual behavior is ridiculously simple in execution, which leads to some interesting complications in human behavior.(I know a gay guy who married and fathered a child with a woman he says he just doesn't see as female.) Let us not even get started on sex for fun (Dolphins and chimps? Oh no, there are FAR more species that do this.)

Makes you wonder just how much of you is you and how much is the environment...
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Student Writer
The issue at large is that human sexuality is derived from hormones in the womb. If nurture has any impact on how it develops (like fetishes and so) I don't know, but it is significantly harder to change than the level of methylmercury an ibis eats.

Ultimately, it is most certainly easier to make everyone bisexual than everyone straight or asexual; expanding is what organisms usually want to do, not contracting. Fire against metal, as Wu Xing dictates.
Reply
:iconziblink:
Ziblink Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
Not quite, there's an interesting body of evidence, for example, hormone spikes at menopause can cause lesbianism in women, indeed women as a gender are not too opposed to same sex relationships, this is likely cultural, as in many ancient cultures there was no 'gay' and 'straight' but 'dominant' and 'submissive' (In ancient Rome it didn't matter if you were bonking a woman, man boy or slave, but man, if you liked being bottom, you were a *freak*) I think a lot of our troubles stem from imposing labels on something as mushy as the brain. (How does the brain tell women apart from men? Lumps on the chest is about the only visual clue it uses. Subtler ones become important at close contact, but for that first 'should I be attracted?' response it's all about chest.)
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2011  Student Writer
Indeed, although male homosexuality seems to be caused hormones that cause fertility in women.

As to visual clues, men and women seem to differ, at least when it comes to sexually arousing stuff. For example, there was a deviation out there showing how differently women and gay men draw males.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconcockatiellover:
CockatielLover Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2011  Student Digital Artist
...I wish we could favorite comments.
Reply
:iconziblink:
Ziblink Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
If they're long enough I can post them as devs and then yo can. I'm sure this'd fit right into anti-wolf.
Reply
:iconcockatiellover:
CockatielLover Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2011  Student Digital Artist
...yes.
Reply
:icondimwitdog:
DimWitDog Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Words of wisdom.
Reply
:iconthe-letter-w:
The-Letter-W Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Lawl, well written. :thumbsup:
Reply
:iconnekonotaishou:
nekonotaishou Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Professional Filmographer
This is hilarious. Has this particular argument been successfully utilized against a Wolfaboo? :rofl:
Reply
:iconangelobelmont:
angelobelmont Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
Darkness is mightier then Light and Death is mightier then Life. That is all.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2011  Student Writer
Except darkness only equals death on modern times. Historically white and red have been the colours of death
Reply
:iconphycosmiley:
Phycosmiley Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011   Traditional Artist
:clap:
Reply
:iconsulfide:
sulfide Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
LOL. This is awesome.
Reply
:icontarbano:
tarbano Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
this
Reply
:icondark-pangolin:
Dark-Pangolin Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
So wolves are evil because they live in places that have little light? I suppose bats, rats/mice, sharks, owls, and other nocturnal and forest dwelling animals are evil? Also, hyenas are nocturnal, just like wolves. Not saying wolvs are SPESHUL AND MAGICAL AND BETTER THAN EVERYTHING, but they're definitely not evil
Reply
:icongabalot:
Gabalot Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Not really. It's wolfaboo logic.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Student Writer
Not because they're dark, but because they're under the Moon, which is dark and light. The wolfaboo logic example shows moles, which live in darkness, as being morally superior for not being under the Moon.
Reply
:icondark-pangolin:
Dark-Pangolin Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
But that still doesn't make them "evil." that's kind of like werewolf logic, which obviously don't exist
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Student Writer
Ultimately none of this actually makes any sense, which is kinda of the point
Reply
:icondark-pangolin:
Dark-Pangolin Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
hmmm
Reply
:iconrespeanut:
Respeanut Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
wat.
Reply
:iconf14ace:
f14ace Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
A wolfaboo's head would explode from trying to process all that. :iconexplodingheadplz:
Reply
:iconcharanty:
Charanty Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2011
This is exactly what we need!
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×

More from DeviantArt



Details

Submitted on
August 6, 2011
File Size
2.1 KB
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
2,035
Favourites
38 (who?)
Comments
53
×